Have you noticed
anything odd about this blog? Has it occurred to you that I live in Bordeaux,
one of the most beautiful cities in France; that I blog about architecture; and
that I’ve promised, several times in fact, to write about the architecture of
Bordeaux. But, so far, I haven’t been true to my word. I always seem to be distracted
by some other subject. Sure, one of my first posts was on the Palais Galien, Bordeaux’s
only Roman ruin. And I did a little piece on the boot scrapers around town. And
there was something on Corbu in the ‘burbs. But so far I’ve studiously avoided
writing about the Classical architecture for which Bordeaux is justly famous.
Now why do you
suppose that is? I’ve been thinking about it a lot over the past couple of
weeks, as I continued to put off that long-promised post. And I finally
realized that the answer is a complete no-brainer --- 18th century
classical architecture may be beautiful, but it’s so rational and ordered that, to me, it’s just plain boring.
|
The Bourse and the Fountain of the Three Graces |
As an
architectural term, “Classical” applies to any building whose design is based on
the ancient buildings of Greece and Rome. At it's most basic, this means that the building will
probably be rectangular and each face will be symmetrically arranged. The door
will be in the center of the main façade, with the same number of windows
flanking it on either side. Often there is a porch-like portico on one or more
sides, usually supported by columns designed in the three most common Greek
styles: Doric, Ionic or Corinthian. You’d recognize it anywhere - it’s the favored
style for European palaces and American banks.
Without a doubt
the most classical of Bordeaux’s buildings is the Grand Theatre. Constructed at
roughly the same time as the American Revolution (1773-1780) this is considered the masterpiece of Parisian architect Victor Louis. Not only does the
building perfectly fit the above description of the classical style, but,
appropriately enough, it was also constructed on the site of the city’s
Roman-era forum. Prominent statues of the nine muses and the goddess Juno,
Venus and Minerva top the elegant Corinthian style portico, the front steps of
which provide a gathering spot for locals and tourists alike.
It’s
unquestionably beautiful, but personally I find the Grand Theatre a little bit dull.
|
The Grand Theatre |
Architecture critic Paul Goldberger once described modern design as the ideal style for creating memorable individual buildings. But, he noted, when combined, those same buildings produced cities that were virtually unlivable. On the contrary, the astonishing
thing about Classical architecture is that when you put dozens of similarly unremarkable buildings together, the result is extraordinary. In Bordeaux, the homogeneity of the style
and the human scale (no building is much above five stories)
combine with the cream-colored limestone and graceful details to produce a
seamless cityscape that at times feels as unreal as a stage set. Victor Hugo found the city so beautiful that he wrote: "Take Versailles, add Antwerp, and you have Bordeaux."
There is perhaps no greater acknowledgement of the city's grace and elegance than the fact that Bordeaux served as the model for the wide-scale 19th century modernization of Paris, which resulted in the world's most beautiful city. Georges-Eugene Haussmann, who was largely responsible for that transformation, had served as a Prefect in the Bordeaux region for twenty years. In 1852 Haussmann welcomed Emperor Napoleon III to Bordeaux where they toured the city together. The following year Haussmann was summoned to Paris to undertake the city's renewal, in which he was no doubt influenced by memories of Bordeaux's classical architecture.
|
Cours de l'Intendance, one of Bordeaux's most beautiful streets |
|
The area around the Grand Theatre |
Bordeaux’s
designation by UNESCO as a World Heritage site explicitly recognizes the
cohesiveness of the city’s architectural patrimony. The criterion for inclusion
reads, “Bordeaux, Port of the Moon, represents an outstanding urban and
architectural ensemble, created in the Age of Enlightenment, whose values have
continued up to the first half of the 20th century. Bordeaux is exceptional in
the unity of its urban and architectural classical and neo-classical
expression, which has not undergone any stylistic rupture over more than two
centuries.”
|
Another view of Cours de L'Intendance |
So there you have it.
Finally, an explanation for why I don’t much care for Bordeaux’s individual 18th
century buildings, but am absolutely crazy about the city as a whole.
Love this! I always learn so much!! THanks, Cynthia!!!
ReplyDeleteThanks Claire. Bruce and I feel like we have our own personal cheerleader!
DeleteThe last time I was in Bordeaux, I unexpectedly fell in love. I was prepared for the vineyards. It was, after all, what I had come for. I never expected being swept off my feet by my first view of the architecture of the city at sunset. The scale was human, the pace oh so civilized (at least to this New Yorker) and what finally tipped me over the edge into a full blown love affair was the silent, sleek appearance of the public trolley/tram/ what the heck DO you call that beautiful magic carpet of public transportation?? All I know is that I am coming back and, if I can somehow arrange it, living there. Thanks for reminding me...
ReplyDeleteHello Poetryqn. Thanks for reading and good luck with your plans to come back to Bordeaux. It is a wonderful contrast to NYC!
DeleteWhat a beautiful blog!
ReplyDeleteI just fell in love with Bordeaux (as you can see here: http://lasagnolove.blogspot.de/2013/09/ma-vie-en-france.html) and send greetings from Germany!
Love,
Bambi